5. In context, which of the following would best be inserted after sentence 6 (reproduced below) as an appropriate example? Such problems are expensive for a government to solve, and often a "solution" that helps one group hurts another.
Answer: B
Declaring certain areas off limits to agricultural development can dangerously limit people's food supply.
This statement illustrates the potential negative consequences of a solution aimed at protecting wildlife, demonstrating how it can adversely affect local communities reliant on agriculture.
A) The creation of new watering holes for elephants provides temporary jobs for local residents.
While this option discusses a possible benefit associated with wildlife management, it does not exemplify how a solution can create conflict between different groups, which is the essence of the original statement. Therefore, it does not serve as a relevant example in this context.
B) Declaring certain areas off limits to agricultural development can dangerously limit people's food supply.
This option perfectly exemplifies the dilemma described in the original statement, as it highlights how protecting wildlife can inadvertently harm local communities' access to resources, thus illustrating the conflict between conservation efforts and agricultural needs.
C) Wild animals that prey on domestic livestock are active mostly at night.
This statement provides information about wildlife behavior but does not connect to the theme of conflicting interests between wildlife conservation and agricultural needs. It fails to illustrate how a solution can negatively impact one group while benefiting another.
D) Legislation attempting to transfer responsibility for wildlife to a country's citizens has failed in other parts of Africa.
While this option discusses legislative attempts similar to those in Namibia, it does not directly address the conflict between solutions for wildlife preservation and the needs of local populations. It fails to provide a clear example of how a solution could hurt another group, making it less relevant.
Conclusion
Option B is the most appropriate example to insert after the original statement, as it clearly demonstrates the conflict between wildlife conservation and agricultural needs, aligning with the core issue presented. All other options either fail to illustrate this conflict or provide irrelevant information, solidifying Option B as the best choice.