Question 3

Passage 1 makes use of personal anecdote.

Passage 1 utilizes a personal anecdote as the narrator shares their firsthand experience of walking alongside a lion, reflecting their feelings and thoughts about the situation. This personal narrative approach contrasts with the more analytical nature of Passage 2.

A) Scientific observation

While scientific observation involves empirical evidence and objective data, Passage 1 does not present any scientific findings or analyses. Instead, it focuses on the narrator's subjective experience with the lion, which does not qualify as a scientific observation.

B) Historical allusion

Historical allusion refers to references to historical events or figures to provide context or depth. Passage 1 does not reference any historical events or figures; it is centered on the immediate experience of the narrator with the lion, making this option incorrect.

C) Personal anecdote

This option is correct because Passage 1 is grounded in the narrator's personal experience and feelings about being near a lion. The storytelling aspect highlights individual perception and emotion, which is characteristic of a personal anecdote.

D) Logical reasoning

Logical reasoning involves the use of structured arguments and evidence to draw conclusions. Passage 1 does not engage in logical reasoning; it is more descriptive and emotive, focusing on personal experience rather than argumentation.

Conclusion

The correct answer is C, as Passage 1 effectively employs a personal anecdote to convey the narrator's emotions and experiences. In contrast, all other options fail to accurately describe the nature of Passage 1, which centers on individual storytelling rather than scientific data, historical context, or logical argumentation. This distinction underscores the narrative style of Passage 1 compared to the analytical tone of Passage 2.